Sorry, it looks like you entered the wrong password.
Assessing tenure security
7 0
Last updated 3 years ago First published 25 October, 2021
This is a decision tree to assess whether tenure security is a helpful strategy to increase positive environmental outcomes of a community-based conservation program.
Does community have rights to the territory/ resource in question?
Yes. No.
Are the rights formal or informal?
Formal. Informal.
Assurance of rights: is there conflcit or political instability, social inequality, power asymmetry, land use issues, inmigration, policy violation and resource exploitation??
Yes. No.
Work with governments to resolve conflict..
Substence of the rights: does the user have access to all bundle of rights? Is there resource documentation or formal title?
Yes. No..
Consider following solutions for "informal rights"..
Are the formal rights upheld locally?
Yes. No.
Conservation intivatives likely to result in positive outcomes..
Consider waiting on starting new external conservation initiative .
Does community have access to the whole bundle of rights?
Yes. No.
Is resource accessible by all individuals of community equally?
Yes. No.
Refrain from new conservation initiatives..
Is there fair and consistent conflict resolution?
Yes.
Consider new conservation initiatives in parnership with community.
Is there a process to recognize any form of tenure?
Yes. No.